Trusted intelligence layer verified · specialist · governed

Defensible intelligence for high-stakes content.

Specialist agents review every segment against your Org Brain, surface confidence and risk, and route uncertainty to human review. Approved corrections improve your Org Brain — so the next review starts from what your team has already decided.

Verified

Every claim sourced.

Specialist

Domain-specific agents.

Governed

Human-approved learning.

Audit-ready

Evidence preserved.

arbitr | meridian capital
in-region · eu-west
Active review

Q3_Earnings_Report.pdf

18 pages · 247 of 247 segments extracted
Projected confidence 93 / 100
Specialists
4 ready
Guardrails
5 active
Flags
12 require review
Org Brain
1,247 entries
Status
  • · Reading Q3_Earnings_Report.pdf
  • · Extracting segments
  • · Routing to specialists
  • · Applying guardrails
  • · Checking against Org Brain
  • · Scoring confidence
The canonical workflow

Upload · Extract · Review · Publish.

Four stages, one system of record. Specialist agents prepare the work, confidence scoring exposes uncertainty, and human reviewers approve what ships.

01 Upload

Add the source content.

A filing, a prospectus, a brand-sensitive document, a multilingual brief. arbitr accepts native PDF, DOCX, HTML, and scanned OCR.

  • · Q3_Earnings_Report.pdf · 18 pages
  • · detected: TSE filing
  • · languages: EN · JA
02 Extract

Read, segment, and route.

Structure-aware extraction identifies standards, terminology, and source references — then routes each segment to the right specialist.

  • · 247 of 247 segments extracted
  • · 4 specialists assigned
  • · 5 guardrails enabled
03 Review

Score, flag, and escalate.

Specialists check segments against your Org Brain. Confidence is quantified, risk is flagged, and below-threshold items are escalated to a human reviewer.

  • · projected confidence 93 / 100
  • · 12 flags require review
  • · 2 below 85 threshold
04 Publish

Approve, export, preserve.

The reviewer signs off. arbitr generates an evidence report — sources, confidence, guardrail checks, and reviewer decisions — ready for audit.

  • · evidence report (PDF + JSON)
  • · reviewer decisions preserved
  • · corrections added to Org Brain
The evidence report

Confidence you can show your work for.

Every output is connected to its sources, the specialists that reviewed it, the guardrails that checked it, and the human who approved it.

arbitr | meridian capital
workspace · eu-west arbitr/evidence-2026-04-Q3
Specialists who reviewed
  • J-GAAP Specialist
    Resolved 4 terminology conflicts · +12 pts
    Done
  • Terminology Specialist
    Aligned 8 entries against your Org Brain
    Done
  • Brand Voice Specialist
    Suggested 3 revisions in EN copy
    Recommended
  • EU Regulatory Agent
    1 ASBJ reference required
    Pending
Flags · 12 require review
Critical
ASBJ reference missing in segment 042.
tse · disclosure · p.7, ¶3
Pending
"Material adverse effect" rendered as advisory in segment 088 (JA target).
ja · ¶2 · modal softening
Resolved
Terminology conflict on "operating margin" reconciled via Org Brain.
added to org brain · accepted by reviewer
·
The specialists

Domain-specific agents.
Bounded review tasks.

Specialists are not one generic assistant. Each has a defined scope, a defined source of truth, and a defined set of guardrails. They prepare the work — your reviewers approve what ships.

Regulatory

J-GAAP Specialist

Checks Japanese accounting standard references in TSE filings. Flags missing ASBJ references; reconciles terminology conflicts against your Org Brain.

+12 pts avg confidence · 4 conflicts resolved (last run)
Regulatory

EU Regulatory Agent

Reviews disclosure language against EU directives. Surfaces jurisdictional drift across language pairs and escalates covenant softening for legal review.

EN · DE · FR · IT · ES · NL
Quality

Brand Voice Specialist

Reviews tone, register, and approved phrasing against your brand guidelines. Suggests revisions; never overrides reviewer judgment.

3 revisions suggested (last run)
Linguistic

Terminology Specialist

Aligns segments against approved terminology and translation memory. Resolves ambiguity using prior reviewer-approved decisions.

8 conflicts reconciled · 1,247 org brain entries
Coverage

Source Coverage Agent

Verifies that every claim in the output is backed by an identifiable source segment. Below-threshold items are flagged for review.

11 of 12 disclosure segments matched
Filing

Filing Review Agent

Compiles the evidence report — confidence, sources, flags, reviewer decisions, and Org Brain updates — into an audit-ready PDF and JSON bundle.

PDF + JSON · audit-ready
Governed memory

Your Org Brain
improves through approved corrections.

The Org Brain is the customer-controlled memory layer that stores approved terminology, prior decisions, reviewed corrections, source references, and domain rules — so every specialist works from the same verified context.

It does not learn or change without control. It improves through approved corrections, not uncontrolled model evolution.

  • Approved entriesTerminology, reviewed corrections, prior decisions, domain rules.
  • Source-backedEvery entry connects to the segment, reviewer, and reason it was added.
  • Tenant-isolatedYour memory never leaves your boundary. Customer-controlled, customer-owned.
  • ReviewableRoll an entry back, amend it, or remove it. The audit trail preserves the change.
Org Brain · meridian capital
1,247 entries
  • "Operating margin" — preferred rendering in JA Approved
    terminology · added by reviewer · 2026-04-20
  • ASBJ reference required for TSE disclosure §7 Approved
    domain rule · added by deputy gc · 2026-03-12
  • Auditor name canonical form: "E&Y LLP" Approved
    prior decision · 38 references · 2026-02
  • "Material adverse effect" — preserve binding modal Recommended
    recommended by terminology specialist · awaiting review
  • Brand voice: avoid "leverage" in customer-facing copy Approved
    brand guideline · added 2025-11
Add to Org Brain → via reviewer approval only
Sage · intelligence assistant

Sage explains.
Reviewers approve.

Sage explains scores, flags, sources, and agent reasoning. It can summarize a confidence drop, locate a source reference, or compare two reviewer decisions. It does not approve, certify, or guarantee.

  • CanExplain · summarize · compare · locate · clarify · escalate
  • CannotApprove · certify · guarantee · override guardrails
Sage · meridian capital workspace
in-region · audit logged
Reviewer · Priya N.
Why did confidence on segment 042 drop from 91 to 86?
Sage
Confidence dropped because segment 042 references a US standard with no ASBJ equivalent in your Org Brain. The J-GAAP Specialist flagged this as Critical and recommended a fix sourced from prior decision DEC-2025-11-031.
I found 2 prior decisions that apply. Review the suggested replacement, or send the segment to the J-GAAP Specialist for re-review.
Reviewer · Priya N.
Can you approve this report so we can publish?
Sage
I cannot approve this output. 3 critical flags remain unresolved — including the missing ASBJ reference. A reviewer must resolve or override them before publishing.
License to operate

Trust is a property of the architecture.

arbitr is designed to meet the review a serious Security, Legal, and Compliance function would put it through. The controls below are architectural commitments, not marketing claims.

Isolation
  • Tenant-isolated workspace.

    Your data, your Org Brain, your reviewer decisions — never blended with another tenant's.

  • BYOK, customer-held keys.

    Revoke the key, revoke access. Full stop.

  • No-train, by contract.

    No customer inputs or outputs are used to train arbitr or any upstream model.

Residency
  • In-region processing.

    US · EU · UK · APAC. Pinned at workspace creation.

  • Customer-controlled boundary.

    Connectors, queues, and exports defined by your admin.

  • Cross-border controls.

    Transfers logged and gated against your residency policy.

Controls
  • SSO · SCIM · RBAC.

    Identity, provisioning, and role scoping via your existing IdP.

  • SOC 2 Type II.

    Annually audited. ISO 27001 in progress.

  • Audit trail by default.

    Every finding, decision, and Org Brain change is recorded and exportable.

arbitr/trust-center · policies · sub-processors · attestations · audit log
Open the trust center →
Built for the teams who carry the risk

One platform.
One standard of evidence.

Legal

Defensible review of multilingual contract and disclosure language.

Every flagged clause carries its rationale and source.

artifact · evidence report
Compliance

Consistent review across languages and jurisdictions.

Same finding, same interpretation, same record — every market.

artifact · cross-market review pack
Risk

See the right risk first, every time.

Triage ordered by risk × business context, not severity alone.

artifact · prioritized review queue
GRC

A complete, exportable audit posture.

Findings, citations, reviewers, sign-offs, model versions — reproducible.

artifact · audit bundle (pdf + json)
CISO

A tenancy model your team approves in one pass.

Isolated, in-region, BYOK, no-train. Receipts in the trust center.

artifact · trust center attestations
Questions buyers ask first

For Security, Legal, and Compliance.

Does arbitr retain our data?

Zero retention is the default. Documents and derivatives are purged on session close. Customers may opt-in to encrypted, tenant-scoped retention with a defined TTL.

Is customer data used to train models?

Never. The no-train guarantee is contractual. No inputs or outputs are used to train arbitr or any upstream model. Approved corrections improve your Org Brain — they do not retrain a model.

Where is processing performed?

In the region you choose — US, EU, UK, or APAC. Workspaces run inside dedicated VPCs with customer-held KMS keys (BYOK).

How are outputs cited?

Every claim maps to a specific section, page, and paragraph. Citations are deterministic, machine-verifiable, and exportable alongside every evidence report.

What approves the final output?

A human reviewer. Specialists prepare, score, flag, and recommend. They do not approve, certify, or publish on their own.

What document types are supported?

Regulatory filings, prospectuses, contracts, policies, board packs, translation projects, brand-sensitive content, and operational reports. Native PDF, DOCX, HTML, and scanned OCR.

Engage with arbitr

Confidence you can show your work for.

Upload one document to create your first evidence report. We onboard a limited number of enterprise engagements each quarter.

By invitation & referral · workspace provisioned in-region

Ready to run your first review? Start a review